Security News
긴급도 49/100 심각도 4.7 · 보통 악용확률 0.6% CWE-362

CVE-2026-53352

Qualys 위협 인텔 · 심각도 5/5 · QID 591803 · ICS
실제 공격 관측 측면이동 쉬운 악용 대량 데이터 유출 서비스 거부 악성코드 연계 웜 전파 권한상승 원격코드실행
  • CVSS Temporal 9.1 (현재 위협 반영)
  • 익스플로잇 성숙도: 기능적 (3/4)
  • 공격 위치: 원격
  • 패치: 가능
  • 익스플로잇 프레임워크: Metasploit, GitHub
  • 연계 악성코드: CVE-2026-43499 (Exploit); Egairtigado (Trojan); Ravartar (Trojan); Vigorf (Trojan); CVE-2026-46333 (Exploit)
  • PCI-DSS 관련
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

signal: clear JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK for caller in zap_other_threads()

When a multi-threaded process receives a stop signal (e.g., SIGSTOP),
do_signal_stop() sets JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING and JOBCTL_STOP_CONSUME on all
threads and sets signal->group_stop_count to the number of threads. If
one of the threads concurrently calls execve(), de_thread() invokes
zap_other_threads() to kill all other threads. zap_other_threads()
aborts the pending group stop by resetting signal->group_stop_count to 0
and clears the JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK for all other threads. However, it
fails to clear the job control flags for the calling thread.

When execve() completes, the calling thread returns to user mode and
checks for pending signals. Seeing the stale JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING flag,
it calls do_signal_stop(), which invokes task_participate_group_stop().
Since JOBCTL_STOP_CONSUME is still set, it attempts to decrement the
already-zero signal->group_stop_count, triggering a warning:

sig->group_stop_count == 0
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 6475 at kernel/signal.c:373
task_participate_group_stop+0x215/0x2d0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
do_signal_stop+0x3be/0x5c0 kernel/signal.c:2619
get_signal+0xa8c/0x1330 kernel/signal.c:2884
arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xbc/0x840 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337
exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x8c/0x4d0 kernel/entry/common.c:98
do_syscall_64+0x33e/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
</TASK>

Fix this race condition by clearing the JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK for the
calling thread in zap_other_threads(), ensuring it does not retain any
stale job control state after the thread group is destroyed. This aligns
with other functions that tear down a thread group and abort group
stops, such as zap_process() and complete_signal(), which correctly
clear these flags for all threads including the current one.
타임라인
  1. NVD 공개
  2. 첫 보도 CISA Advisories · 지멘스 SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP

날짜 정보 없는 신호: 실제 공격 관측 웜 전파

벡터: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

NVD 상세 ↗   GitHub Advisory ↗   참고 링크 ↗

이 취약점을 다룬 기사 (2)

← 취약점 목록