Security News
긴급도 14/100 심각도 5.5 · 보통 악용확률 6.5%

CVE-2025-39748

Qualys 위협 인텔 · 심각도 5/5 · QID 591802 · ICS
공개 익스플로잇 권한상승 인증 불필요 원격코드실행 CISA KEV
  • CVSS Temporal 8.8 (현재 위협 반영)
  • 익스플로잇 성숙도: PoC (2/4)
  • 공격 위치: 원격
  • 패치: 가능
  • 익스플로잇 프레임워크: GitHub
  • PCI-DSS 관련
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Forget ranges when refining tnum after JSET

Syzbot reported a kernel warning due to a range invariant violation on
the following BPF program.

0: call bpf_get_netns_cookie
1: if r0 == 0 goto <exit>
2: if r0 & Oxffffffff goto <exit>

The issue is on the path where we fall through both jumps.

That path is unreachable at runtime: after insn 1, we know r0 != 0, but
with the sign extension on the jset, we would only fallthrough insn 2
if r0 == 0. Unfortunately, is_branch_taken() isn't currently able to
figure this out, so the verifier walks all branches. The verifier then
refines the register bounds using the second condition and we end
up with inconsistent bounds on this unreachable path:

1: if r0 == 0 goto <exit>
r0: u64=[0x1, 0xffffffffffffffff] var_off=(0, 0xffffffffffffffff)
2: if r0 & 0xffffffff goto <exit>
r0 before reg_bounds_sync: u64=[0x1, 0xffffffffffffffff] var_off=(0, 0)
r0 after reg_bounds_sync: u64=[0x1, 0] var_off=(0, 0)

Improving the range refinement for JSET to cover all cases is tricky. We
also don't expect many users to rely on JSET given LLVM doesn't generate
those instructions. So instead of improving the range refinement for
JSETs, Eduard suggested we forget the ranges whenever we're narrowing
tnums after a JSET. This patch implements that approach.
타임라인
  1. NVD 공개
  2. 첫 보도 CISA Advisories · 지멘스 SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP

벡터: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

NVD 상세 ↗   GitHub Advisory ↗   참고 링크 ↗

이 취약점을 다룬 기사 (2)

← 취약점 목록